Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the sociocultural meanings of facemasks during the SARS outbreak and post-SARS era in Hong Kong

From: Qualitative study on the shifting sociocultural meanings of the facemask in Hong Kong since the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak: implications for infection control in the post-SARS era

 

During the SARS outbreak

In the post-SARS era

Perceived function of facemasks

Primarily used for infection prevention

Primarily used for infection prevention

Sociocultural meaning of facemasks

Perceived as a new social norm

Perceived as a sign of people with negative attributes

 

Perceived as a form of civic responsibility

Perceived as a medium for inviting stigmas and teasing

 

Perceived as symbolic support for health care providers

Perceived as a sign of weakness

 

Perceived as a tool for achieving a sense of control and security

Perceived to hinder recovery

Perceived nature of facemasks

Medical professionals’ advice was critical for the participants’ choice of an appropriate facemask

Toxic to skin