Skip to main content

Table 6 Myocardial infarction regressed on education, period, economic context, and change variables, for women and men (y-standardized Odds Ratios)

From: Social inequality in morbidity, framed within the current economic crisis in Spain

 

Men

Women

 

Model 0

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3b

Model 0

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3a

 

OR

 

OR

 

OR

 

OR

 

OR

 

OR

 

OR

 

OR

 

Intercept

0.12

***

0.04

***

0.04

***

0.04

***

0.07

***

0.03

***

0.05

***

0.04

***

 (1) Individual variablesa

                

  Education Level (ref. University Studies)

                

  Illiterate, no diploma, or primary education

  

1.29

**

1.28

**

1.44

**

  

1.49

**

1.40

*

1.74

**

   Lower Secondary

  

1.31

**

1.31

**

1.43

**

  

1.27

 

1.20

 

1.47

*

   Upper Secondary

  

1.16

 

1.15

 

1.28

+

  

1.10

 

1.06

 

1.29

 

   Higher technical education

  

1.03

 

1.03

 

1.10

   

0.93

 

0.89

 

0.99

 

 (2) Period Variables

                

  Period (ref. 2003)

                

   2009

  

1.02

 

1.04

 

1.11

   

1.10

 

0.75

 

0.69

+

   2011

  

0.88

+

1.01

 

1.12

   

0.94

 

0.63

+

0.55

*

  Change in real GDP growth rate

    

1.02

 

1.06

     

0.83

+

1.02

 

  Change in low work intensity indicator

    

0.99

 

0.90

*

    

0.96

 

0.96

 

 (3) Context Variables

                

  Mean real GDP growth rate

    

0.99

 

1.01

     

1.02

 

1.05

 

  Mean low work intensity indicator

    

1.02

 

1.02

     

1.08

**

1.08

***

 (1) Education level* (2) Period Variables

                

  Illiterate, no diploma, or primary education* Change in real GDP growth rate

              

0.77

+

  Lower Secondary* Change in real GDP growth rate

              

0.75

*

  Upper Secondary* Change in real GDP growth rate

              

0.74

+

  Illiterate, no diploma, or primary education* Change in Low work intensity indicator

      

1.11

*

        

  Lower Secondary* Change in Low work intensity indicator

      

1.12

*

        

Variance

                

 Region

0.036

(0.035)

0.016

(0.021)

0.019

(0.024)

0.022

(0.031)

0.096

(0.128)

0.069

(0.088)

0.029

(0.043)

0.021

(0.033)

 Period

0.011

(0.015)

0.016

(0.017)

0.006

(0.009)

0.016

(0.023)

0.158

(0.121)

0.072

(0.106)

0.039

(0.039)

0.026

(0.032)

VPC

                

 Regionb

1.1 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

2.7 %

2.0 %

0.9 %

0.6 %

 Periodc

0.3 %

0.5 %

0.2 %

0.5 %

4.5 %

2.1 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

VPC at higher levels (Region + Period)

1.4 %

1.0 %

0.8 %

1.1 %

7.2 %

4.1 %

2.0 %

1.4 %

DIC:

4047.762

3448.372

3451.007

3450.421

1851.502

1679.942

1670.216

1673.497

 Units: Region

17

17

17

17

17

17

17

17

 Units: Period

51

51

51

51

51

51

51

51

 Units: Individuals

21,257

21,049

21,049

21,049

26,180

25,917

25,917

25,917

  1. ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05; +p < 0.1
  2. Nmen = 21,260; Nwomen = 26,182
  3. aAll analyses controlled for age, work status, marital status, and household type at individual level
  4. Model 3a controlled for cross-level interaction effects: change in real GDP growth rate* education level; Model 3b controlled for cross-level interaction effect: change in low work intensity indicator * education level (See complete models in Additional file 2)
  5. bVariance Partition Coefficient at region level (σ2 region)/ (σ2 region + σ2 period + 3.29)
  6. cVariance Partition Coefficient at period level (σ2 period)/ (σ2 region + σ2 period + 3.29)