Table 4 Access to PC experienced and perceived by patients
Access to PC dimension | Number of patients (share) | Mean(sd) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Communicational (N=1,943) | 0 = bad access | 3 (0.2%) | 5.548 (0.888) |
1 | 18 (0.9%) | ||
2 | 17 (0.9%) | ||
3 | 29 (1.5%) | ||
4 | 111 (5.7%) | ||
5 | 393 (20.2%) | ||
6 = good access* | 1,372 (70.6%) | ||
Cultural (N=1,593) | 0 = bad access | 3 (0.2%) | 3.930 (0.356) |
1 | 4 (0.3%) | ||
2 | 19 (1.2%) | ||
3 | 49 (3.1%) | ||
4 = good access* | 1,518 (95.3%) | ||
Financial (N=1,928) | 0 = bad access | 1 (0.1%) | 1.992 (0.094) |
1 | 13 (0.7%) | ||
2 = good access* | 1,914 (99.3%) | ||
Geographical (N=1,874) | 0 = bad access | 50 (2.7%) | 1.860 (0.417) |
1 | 163 (8.7%) | ||
2 = good access* | 1,661 (88.6%) | ||
Organizational (N=1,292) | 0 = bad access | 5 (0.4%) | 3.543 (0.732) |
1 | 21 (1.6%) | ||
2 | 93 (7.2%) | ||
3 | 322 (24.9%) | ||
4 = good access* | 851 (65.9%) | ||