Skip to main content

Table 3 The estimated associations between different types of poverty and poor self-rated health (SRH)

From: Multidimensional poverty and health: evidence from a nationwide survey in Japan

Type of poverty

Proportion (%) of poverty

OR

95% CI

Effective or not

Log likelihood

[Rank]

D (1)ā€‰=ā€‰1

10.4

1.38

(1.23, 1.56)

Ā 

āˆ’8666.56

Ā 

D (2)ā€‰=ā€‰1

5.2

1.49

(1.27, 1.74)

Ā 

āˆ’8668.68

Ā 

D (3)ā€‰=ā€‰1

4.3

1.89

(1.59, 2.24)

Effective

āˆ’8656.30

[3]

D (4)ā€‰=ā€‰1

7.5

1.22

(1.06, 1.40)

Ā 

āˆ’8676.76

Ā 

D (1, 2)ā€‰ā‰„ā€‰1

14.4

1.47

(1.33, 1.63)

Ā 

āˆ’8676.76

Ā 

D (1, 3)ā€‰ā‰„ā€‰1

13.7

1.51

(1.36, 1.68)

Ā 

āˆ’8653.19

Ā 

D (1, 4)ā€‰ā‰„ā€‰1

16.4

1.31

(1.18, 1.45)

Ā 

āˆ’8667.23

Ā 

D (2, 3)ā€‰ā‰„ā€‰1

9.0

1.57

(1.39, 1.78)

Effective

āˆ’8656.70

[4]

D (2, 4)ā€‰ā‰„ā€‰1

12.0

1.32

(1.18, 1.48)

Ā 

āˆ’8668.99

Ā 

D (3, 4)ā€‰ā‰„ā€‰1

11.3

1.43

(1.28, 1.61)

Ā 

āˆ’8663.13

Ā 

D (1, 2, 3)ā€‰ā‰„ā€‰1

17.3

1.52

(1.38, 1.68)

Effective

āˆ’8646.36

[1]

D (1, 2, 4)ā€‰ā‰„ā€‰1

19.9

1.38

(1.26, 1.52)

Ā 

āˆ’8658.13

Ā 

D (1, 3, 4)ā€‰ā‰„ā€‰1

19.3

1.40

(1.27, 1.53)

Ā 

āˆ’8657.71

Ā 

D (2, 3, 4)ā€‰ā‰„ā€‰1

15.3

1.41

(1.27, 1.56)

Ā 

āˆ’8660.08

Ā 

D (1, 2, 3, 4)ā€‰ā‰„ā€‰1

22.5

1.42

(1.30, 1.56)

Effective

āˆ’8651.76

[2]

D (1, 2)ā€‰=ā€‰2

1.2

1.31

(0.95, 1.80)

Ā 

āˆ’8678.95

Ā 

D (1, 3)ā€‰=ā€‰2

1.1

2.14

(1.58, 2.89)

Ā 

āˆ’8669.81

Ā 

D (1, 4)ā€‰=ā€‰2

1.5

1.64

(1.25, 2.16)

Ā 

āˆ’8674.66

Ā 

D (2, 3)ā€‰=ā€‰2

0.6

3.42

(2.38, 4.90)

Effective

āˆ’8661.59

[5]

D (2, 4)ā€‰=ā€‰2

0.7

1.75

(1.19, 2.56)

Ā 

āˆ’8676.59

Ā 

D (3, 4)ā€‰=ā€‰2

0.6

2.17

(1.43, 3.28)

Ā 

āˆ’8674.50

Ā 

D (1, 2, 3)ā€‰ā‰„ā€‰2

2.5

1.77

(1.43, 2.19)

Ā 

āˆ’8667.77

Ā 

D (1, 2, 4)ā€‰ā‰„ā€‰2

3.1

1.49

(1.22, 1.82)

Ā 

āˆ’8673.22

Ā 

D (1, 3, 4)ā€‰ā‰„ā€‰2

2.7

1.92

(1.57, 2.34)

Effective

āˆ’8662.90

[7]

D (2, 3, 4)ā€‰ā‰„ā€‰2

1.6

2.21

(1.73, 2.82)

Effective

āˆ’8662.75

[6]

D (1, 2, 3, 4)ā€‰ā‰„ā€‰2

4.3

1.73

(1.46, 2.04)

Ā 

āˆ’8661.46

Ā 

D (1, 2, 3)ā€‰=ā€‰3

0.2

3.37

(1.86, 6.11)

Ā 

āˆ’8673.24

Ā 

D (1, 2, 4)ā€‰=ā€‰3

0.2

1.94

(0.99, 3.82)

Ā 

āˆ’8678.57

Ā 

D (1, 3, 4)ā€‰=ā€‰3

0.2

1.97

(1.04, 3.74)

Ā 

āˆ’8678.33

Ā 

D (2, 3, 4)ā€‰=ā€‰3

0.1

3.49

(1.61, 7.56)

Effective

āˆ’8675.91

[9]

D (1, 2, 3, 4)ā€‰ā‰„ā€‰3

0.6

2.37

(1.62, 3.48)

Effective

āˆ’8671.92

[8]

D (1, 2, 3, 4)ā€‰=ā€‰4

0.1

3.11

(1.01, 9.54)

Ā 

āˆ’8678.40

Ā 
  1. The OR indicates the estimated odds ratio of poor SRH, obtained from the logistic regression models to predict poor SRH by poverty and covariates (sex, age, and marital status). D denotes the number of deprivation in the dimensions in the subsequent parenthesis, where 1ā€‰=ā€‰household income, 2ā€‰=ā€‰education, 3ā€‰=ā€‰social protection, and 4ā€‰=ā€‰housing conditions. Rank indicates the ranking order of pseudo log likelihood.