Skip to main content

Table 2 Binary logistic regression of financial stress - social support model in relation to low psychological well-being in men and women

From: The buffering effect of tangible social support on financial stress: influence on psychological well-being and psychosomatic symptoms in a large sample of the adult general population

 

Low psychological well-being

 

Men

  

Women

  
 

N 36 444a

%

OR (95% CI)b, c

N 42 648a

%

OR (95% CI)b, d

  

***e

  

***e

 

No financial stress-high tangible social support

1935f

8.1g

1 (ref)

3535f

13.9g

1 (ref)

Medium financial stress-high tangible social support

716

16.0

1.65 (1.50-1.82)***

1707

22.5

1.41 (1.32-1.51)***

High financial stress-high tangible social support

440

26.9

2.94 (2.59-3.32)***

1104

35.8

2.37 (2.17-2.58)***

No financial stress-low tangible social support

533

14.9

2.06 (1.85-2.29)***

716

25.5

2.51 (2.28-2.76)***

Medium financial stress-low tangible social support

286

25.5

3.24 (2.79-3.75)***

509

37.1

3.23 (2.86-3.65)***

High financial stress-low tangible social support

339

45.3

6.73 (5.75-7.89)***

542

57.0

5.89 (5.13-6.77)***

  1. The data are presented as numbers and percentages of participants with low psychological well-being within each subgroup, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
  2. ***p≤0.001.
  3. aTotal number of participants included in the analysis.
  4. bAdjusted for age, country of birth, employment status, other chronic disease, and year of survey.
  5. cNagelkerke R2 = 0.130.
  6. dNagelkerke R2 = 0.145.
  7. eχ2 test of differences between the subgroups within each sex.
  8. f Number of participants within each subgroup who reported low psychological well-being.
  9. gPercentage of participants within each subgroup who reported low psychological well-being.