Skip to main content

Table 2 Mean BMI ± standard deviation of the study population by socioeconomic status (SES) in men (n = 1522) and women (n = 1818)

From: Socioeconomic inequalities and body mass index in Västerbotten County, Sweden: a longitudinal study of life course influences over two decades

Method of describing SES

Men

Women

Time period individually

  

SES at the age of 40 (t 1 )

  

 Advantaged (0)

26.4 ± 3.3

25.7 ± 3.8*

 Disadvantaged (1)

26.4 ± 3.4

26.7 ± 4.4

SES at the age of 50 (t 2 )

  

 Advantaged (0)

26.4 ± 3.3

25.7 ± 3.8*

 Disadvantaged (1)

26.3 ± 3.5

26.8 ± 4.4

SES at the age of 60 (t 3 )

  

 Advantaged (0)

26.4 ± 3,3

25.6 ± 3.5*

 Disadvantaged (1)

26.2 ± 3.5

26.6 ± 4.4

SES trajectories across three time periods

 

t1

t2

t3

  

0

0

0

26.4 ± 3.5

25.3 ± 3.6**

1

0

0

26.4 ± 3.1

25.8 ± 3.4

0

1

0

26.1 ± 2.8

25.3 ± 3.1

0

0

1

26.5 ± 3.6

25.7 ± 4.9

1

1

0

25.9 ± 3.1

26.6 ± 3.1

1

0

1

26.3 ± 3.2

26.3 ± 3.4

0

1

1

25.5 ± 2.8

26.1 ± 3.8

1

1

1

26.1 ± 3.5

26.6 ± 4.4

Accumulation score: number of times ‘disadvantaged’

0

26.4 ± 3.5

25.3 ± 3.6

1

26.4 ± 3.1

25.8 ± 3.5

2

25.9 ± 3.1

26.2 ± 3.6

3

26.1 ± 3.5

26.6 ± 4.4

  1. *P < 0.01 compared to the disadvantaged group.
  2. **P < 0.01 compared to the stable disadvantaged group (111).
  3. P < 0.01 compared to the most disadvantaged group (n disadvantaged = 3).