Table 6 Univariate analysis (unadjusted results) of Resource Utilisation Bands at age 10 by socio-economic position variables
Socio-economic marker | Resource Utilisation Band at age 10 (% within SEP category) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-user | Healthy user | Low or moderate morbidity | χ2; p-value | ||
Mother’s education | O level or lower | 45 (35.4%) | 37 (29.1%) | 45 (35.4%) | χ22 = 2.3; p = 0.3 |
A level or degree | 20 (29.4%) | 27 (39.7%) | 21 (30.9%) | ||
Father’s education | O level or lower | 32 (32.7%) | 30 (30.6%) | 36 (36.7%) | χ22 = 0.8; p = 0.7 |
A level or degree | 33 (34.0%) | 34 (35.1%) | 30 (30.9%) | ||
Family social class | I, II, III non-manual | 35 (34.3%) | 31 (30.4%) | 36 (35.3%) | χ22 = 0.6; p = 0.7 |
III manual, IV V | 30 (32.3%) | 33 (35.5%) | 30 (32.3%) | ||
Housing tenure (in pregnancy) | Owned/mortgaged | 47 (31.3%) | 54 (36.0%) | 49 (32.7%) | χ22 = 3.0; p = 0.2 |
Other | 18 (40.0%) | 10 (22.2%) | 17 (37.8%) | ||
Family adversity index | 0 | 31 (36.9%) | 27 (32.1%) | 26 (31.0%) | χ62 = 3.1; p = 0.8 |
1 | 17 (29.3%) | 19 (32.8%) | 22 (37.9%) | ||
2 | 12 (40.0%) | 9 (30.0%) | 9 (30.0%) | ||
≥3 | 5 (21.7%) | 9 (39.1%) | 9 (39.1%) | ||
Townsend score (quintile) | 1st (least deprived) | 19 (28.8%) | 24 (36.4%) | 23 (34.9%) | χ62 = 13.5; p = 0.04 |
2 | 10 (28.6%) | 17 (48.6%) | 8 (22.9%) | ||
3 | 17 (38.6%) | 6 (13.6%) | 21 (47.7%) | ||
4th and 5th (most deprived)1 | 19 (38.0%) | 17 (34.0%) | 14 (28.0%) | ||