Table 4 Results of logistic regression analysis of factors influence decision to renew NHIS
Covariates | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
Socio-demographic characteristics | |||
Gender (ref =Male) | 2.5 (1.7, 3.8)** | 2.3 (1.4, 5.2)* | 1.9 (0.9, 6.4) |
Marital status (ref = single) | 3.1 (1.1, 9.0)* | 2.6 (0.6, 5.3) | 2.0 (0.3, 9.3) |
Religion (ref = Christianity) | 0.9 (0.1, 3.1) | 0.8 (0.1, 2.5) | 0.8 (0.2, 3.3) |
Perceived health status | |||
- Very good/good (ref) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
- Fair | 0.9 (0.1, 9.2) | 0.8 (0.2, 10.1) | 0.6 (0.2, 9.9) |
- Poor/Very poor | 1.7 (1.3, 4.7)* | 1.7 (1.2, 5.1)* | 1.9 (1.1, 7.3)** |
Perception about NHIS | |||
- Joining scheme will benefit me (ref = agree) | 0.3 (0.0, 3.7)* | 0.4 (0.1, 4.1) | |
- Will save money from paying hospital bills (ref = agree) | 0.7 (0.1, 3.5) | 0.6 (0.1, 4.3) | |
- Collection of NHIS cards is convenient (ref = agree) | 0.3 (0.0, 8.1) | 0.3 (0.1, 8.5)* | |
- Premium for the package is too high (ref = agree) | 2.5 (1.3, 10.4)** | 2.3 (1.2, 9.5)* | |
- Registration fee is too high (ref = agree) | 1.9 (0.5, 5.9) | 1.6 (0.1, 7.8) | |
Quality of care under NHIS | |||
- Quality of drugs is good (ref = agree) | 1.1 (0.2, 3.9) | ||
- Staff attitude has improved under NHIS (ref = agree) | 0.7 (0.1, 6.2) | ||
Number of obs | 275 | 274 | 270 |
LR chi2(4,9,11) | 143.46 | 156.26 | 164.89 |
Prob > chi2 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
Log likelihood | −344.01797 | −364.1596 | −371.02163 |
Pseudo R2 | 0.48025 | 0.523820 | 0.648281 |