Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of repeated-measures ANOVA among women

From: Longitudinal changes in functional capacity: effects of socio-economic position among ageing adults

WOMEN

     

Model 1

Model 2

  

Baseline

6-year follow-up

Results of

 

Results of

 

Cohort 1946–1950 (n = 374)

 

Mean

SE

Mean

SE

ANOVA

 

ANOVA

 

Education

Elementary school (58%)

12,9

3,9

13,4

4,0

Within Subjects

 

Within Subjects

 
 

Middle school (27%)

12,5

3,3

13,0

3,6

Phys. Capacity

p=0.992

Phys. Capacity

p=0.983

 

Secondary school (15%)

12,2

3,6

12,7

3,4

Between Subjects

Between Subjects

      

Education

p=0.243

Education

p=0.242

Adequacy of income

Good (70%)

12,2

3,4

12,9

3,7

Within Subjects

 

Within Subjects

 
 

Fair or poor (30%)

13,8

4,1

13,9

3,9

Phys. Capacity

p=0.104

Phys. Capacity

p=0.124

      

Between Subjects

Between Subjects

      

Adeq. Of income

p=0.001

Adeq. Of income

p=0.002

Cohort 1936–1940 (n = 405)

         

Education

Elementary school (73%)

14,9

4,5

15,4

4,6

Within Subjects

 

Within Subjects

 
 

Middle school (18%)

13,9

4,1

14,8

4,6

Phys. Capacity

p=0.148

Phys. Capacity

p=0.220

 

Secondary school (9%)

13,4

4,1

14,8

4,7

Between Subjects

Between Subjects

      

Education

p=0.251

Education

p=0.627

Adequacy of income

Good (60%)

14,0

4,2

14,7

4,5

Within Subjects

 

Within Subjects

 
 

Fair or poor (40%)

15,5

4,8

16,1

4,8

Phys. Capacity

p=0.956

Phys. Capacity

p=0.474

      

Between Subjects

Between Subjects

      

Adeq. Of income

p=0.001

Adeq. Of income

p=0.008

Cohort 1926–1930 (n = 236)

         

Education

Elementary school (76%)

18,0

5,1

19,6

4,9

Within Subjects

 

Within Subjects

 
 

Middle school (17%)

14,9

3,5

17,0

4,2

Phys. Capacity

p=0.676

Phys. Capacity

p=0.220

 

Secondary school (7%)

14,5

4,5

16,8

4,8

Between Subjects

Between Subjects

      

Education

p<0.001

Education

p=0.627

Adequacy of income

Good (57%)

15,6

4,1

17,7

4,4

Within Subjects

 

Within Subjects

 
 

Fair or poor (43%)

19,4

5,3

20,4

5,0

Phys. Capacity

p=0.033

Phys. Capacity

p<0.001

      

Between Subjects

Between Subjects

      

Adeq. Of income

p<0.001

Adeq. Of income

p<0.001

  1. Model 1: Sociodemographic measure.
  2. Model 2: Sociodemographic measure+ smoking status, physical activity, consumption of fruits and vegetables, alcohol consumption.