Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of repeated-measures ANOVA among men

From: Longitudinal changes in functional capacity: effects of socio-economic position among ageing adults

MEN

     

Model 1

Model 2

  

Baseline

6-year follow-up

Results of

 

Results of

 

Cohort 1946–1950 (n = 278)

 

Mean

SE

Mean

SE

ANOVA

 

ANOVA

 

Education

Elementary school (69%)

12,6

3,5

12,6

3,5

Within Subjects

 

Within Subjects

 
 

Middle school (18%)

12,4

3,5

13,0

4,0

Phys. Capacity

p=0.012

Phys. Capacity

p=0.003

 

Secondary school (13%)

11,5

2,2

13,2

4,3

Between Subjects

Between Subjects

      

Education

p=0.888

Education

p=0.771

Adequacy of income

Good (62%)

11,7

2,6

12,2

3,2

Within Subjects

 

Within Subjects

 
 

Fair or poor (38%)

13,5

4,2

13,5

4,3

Phys. Capacity

p=0.214

Phys. Capacity

p=0.292

      

Between Subjects

Between Subjects

      

Adeq. Of income

p<0.001

Adeq. Of income

p<0.001

Cohort 1936–1940 (n = 350)

         

Education

Elementary school (80%)

13,8

4,1

14,1

4,4

Within Subjects

 

Within Subjects

 
 

Middle school (13%)

13,8

4,0

13,5

3,5

Phys. Capacity

p=0.497

Phys. Capacity

p=0.788

 

Secondary school (7%)

11,9

2,6

12,5

4,1

Between Subjects

Between Subjects

      

Education

p=0.075

Education

p=0.375

Adequacy of income

Good (64%)

13,1

3,5

13,5

4,0

Within Subjects

 

Within Subjects

 
 

Fair or poor (36%)

14,8

4,7

14,7

4,6

Phys. Capacity

p=0.190

Phys. Capacity

p=0.658

      

Between Subjects

Between Subjects

      

Adeq. Of income

p=0.001

Adeq. Of income

p=0.004

Cohort 1926–1930 (n = 221)

         

Education

Elementary school (81%)

15,7

4,8

16,8

4,8

Within Subjects

 

Within Subjects

 
 

Middle school (9%)

13,8

4,1

14,6

4,9

Phys. Capacity

p=0.662

Phys. Capacity

p=0.372

 

Secondary school (10%)

14,8

4,9

15,1

4,5

Between Subjects

Between Subjects

      

Education

p=0.080

Education

p=0.129

Adequacy of income

Good (58%)

15,0

4,6

15,9

4,8

Within Subjects

 

Within Subjects

 
 

Fair or poor (42%)

16,0

5,0

17,1

4,9

Phys. Capacity

p=0.762

Phys. Capacity

p=0.279

      

Between Subjects

Between Subjects

      

Adeq. Of income

p=0.074

Adeq. Of income

p=0.283

  1. Model 1: Sociodemographic measure.
  2. Model 2: Sociodemographic measure+ smoking status, physical activity, consumption of fruits and vegetables, alcohol consumption.