Skip to main content

Table 4 Users of different supposedly free public health goods and services who made payments for them

From: Are the poor differentially benefiting from provision of priority public health services? A benefit incidence analysis in Nigeria

 

Immunisation

ITNs

Anti-malaria drugs

ANC

Childbirth

ARVs

FP

TB

 

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Number that paid by urban-rural residence

Urban

193 (55.6%)

0 (0%)

280 (83.6%)

27 (56.3%)

21 (75.0%)

1 (100%)

0

1 (25%)

Rural

154 (44.4%)

4 (100%)

55 (16.4%)

21 (43.7%)

7 (25.0%)

0

0

3 (75%)

Chi-square (p-value)

69.9 (.00001)

20.1 (.001)

.77 (.44)

29.1 (.00001)

2.4 (.17)

.17 (.85)

Na

11.3 (.012)

Number that paid by gender

Male

152 (43.8%)

0

120 (35.8%)

NA

NA

0

0

2 (50%)

Female

195 (56.2%)

4 (100%)

215 (64.2%)

NA

NA

0

0

2 (50%)

Chi-square (p-value)

11.6 (.001)

2.3 (.30)

.26 (.63)

  

Na

1.7 (.38)

.33 (.63)

Number that paid by SES

Quintile 1

81(23.5%)

1 (25%)

36 (10.8%)

13 (27.1%)

4 (14.3%)

0

0

1 (25%)

Quintile 2

67 (19.4%)

1 (25%)

57 (17.1%)

5 (10.4%)

4 (14.3%)

0

0

2 (50%)

Quintile 3

70 (20.3%)

1 (25%)

64 (19.2%)

6 (12.5%)

5 (17.9%)

0

0

0

Quintile 4

65 (18.8%)

1 (25%)

78 (23.4%)

15 (31.3%)

8 (28.6%)

0

0

0

Quintile 5

62 (18.0%)

0

98 (29.4%)

9 (18.8%)

7 (25.0%)

1/165 (0.6%)

0

1 (25%)

Chi-square (p-value)

31.4 (.00001)

2.0 (.73)

6.3 (.18)

14.8 (.005)

.54 (.97)

2.7 (.61)

 

5.1 (.28)

Concentration index

−0.02

−0.17

0.03

−0.13

−0.03

-

-

−0.22

Total

347

4

335

48

28

1

0

4

  1. n=number of people that paid for the services.