Table 4 Results of logistic regression analysis for the odds of ranking dental care first for new government spending (No=0, Yes=1)
Characteristics | Model 1: Unadjusted OR† | Model 2: Adjusted OR‡ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Odds ratio [95% CI] | P | Odds ratio [95% CI] | P | |
Sex | ||||
Male | 0.98 [0.73,1.34] | 0.933 | 0.99 [0.67,1.45] | 0.989 |
Female (reference) | ||||
Age | ||||
18– 29 | 1.17 [0.68,2.02] | 0.579 | 1.52 [0.74,3.15] | 0.258 |
30–44 | 0.99 [0.59,1.69] | 0.988 | 2.03 [1.04,3.97] | 0.038 |
45–64 | 1.14 [0.69,1.87] | 0.619 | 1.88 [0.99,3.55] | 0.053 |
65+ (reference) | ||||
Household income | ||||
<$20-000 | 2.70 [1.56,4.66] | 0.000 | 2.15 [1.10,4.17] | 0.024 |
$20,000-<$40,000 | 1.58 [0.97,2.56] | 0.066 | 1.09 [0.60, 1.97] | 0.787 |
$40,000-<$60,000 | 1.23 [0.74,2.05] | 0.424 | 1.04 [0.59, 1.83] | 0.893 |
$60,000-<$80,000 | 0.98 [0.53,1.81] | 0.955 | 1.01 [0.52, 1.94] | 0.977 |
$80,000+ (reference) | ||||
Educational attainment | ||||
<High-school | 0.98 [0.65,1.46] | 0.901 | 0.94 [0.57,1.53] | 0.790 |
College | 1.58 [1.07,2.32] | 0.022 | 1.64 [1.02,2.65] | 0.041 |
University/Post-grad (reference) | ||||
Private health insurance status | ||||
Insured | 0.38 [0.27,0.51] | 0.000 | 0.313 [0.20,0.48] | 0.000 |
Non-insured (reference) | ||||
Residence status | ||||
Rural | 1.19 [0.80,1.77] | 0.389 | ||
Urban (reference) | ||||