|
Model
|
N
|
%
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Min
|
Max
|
|---|
|
Health
| | |
2.55
|
1.01
|
0.00
|
4.00
|
|
0 (poor)
|
17
|
2%
| | | | |
|
1 (fair)
|
156
|
17%
| | | | |
|
2 (good)
|
214
|
23%
| | | | |
|
3 (very good)
|
405
|
43%
| | | | |
|
4 (excellent)
|
143
|
15%
| | | | |
|
Socio-economic conditions/resources
| | | | | | |
|
Married
|
304
|
33%
| | | | |
|
Male
|
249
|
27%
| | | | |
|
Unemployment
|
579
|
62%
| | | | |
|
Education
| | | | | | |
|
None or some primary
|
325
|
35%
| | | | |
|
Some secondary
|
375
|
40%
| | | | |
|
Matric or higher
|
235
|
25%
| | | | |
|
Income
| | |
1,250
|
2.13
|
0.00
|
> 7,001
|
|
Social capital
| | |
2.97
|
0.54
|
1.00
|
4.00
|
|
Housing quality
| | | | | | |
|
Leaky roof
|
471
|
50%
| | | | |
|
Formally build house
|
670
|
62%
| | | | |
|
Neighbourhood quality
| | | | |
|
Crime in the area
|
2.03
|
0.89
|
1.00
|
4.00
|
|
Residents get value for their rental rates
|
2.19
|
0.74
|
1.00
|
4.00
|
