Table 2 Proportion variations in ownership of ITNs and untreated nets, in various social economic groups of study households
Social economic groups | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Poorest | Very poor | Poor | Less Poor | Least Poor | Conc. Index |
1. Mpanda (N = 369)Over all | ||||||
Proportion ownership % (N) [95% CI] | ||||||
ITN (N = 322) | 17.9%(66)[14.1-22.2] | 17.1%(63)[13.4-21.3] | 15.5%(57)[11.9-19.5] | 18.7%(69)[14.9-23.10] | 18.2%(67)[14.4-22.5] | 0.0102 |
Untreated net (N = 47) | 3.0%(11) [1.5-5.3] | 2.2%(8) [0.9-4.2] | 2.7%(10)[1.3-4.9] | 1.6%(6)[0.6-3.5] | 3.2%(12)[1.7-5.6] | 0.0075 |
Any net (N = 369) | 20.9%(77)[16.8-25] | 19.2%(71)[15.3-23.6] | 18.2%(67)[14.4-22.5] | 20.3%(75)[16.3-24.8] | 21.4%(79)[17.3-26.0] | 0.0087 |
2.Kisarawe | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Proportion ownership % (N) [95% CI] | ||||||
ITN(N = 127) | 8.7%(18)[5.2-13.4] | 9.2%(19)[5.6-14.0] | 12.6%(26)[8.4-17.9] | 13.5%(28)[9.2-19.0] | 17.4%(36)[12.5-23.4] | 0.1318 |
Untreated Net(N = 80) | 3.4%(7)[1.4-6.8] | 3.4%(7)[1.4-6.8] | 6.8%(14)[3.7-11.1] | 8.2%(17)[4.9-12.8] | 17.0%(36)[12.1-22.7] | 0.303 |
Any net(=207) | 12.1%[25)[8.0-17.3] | 12.6%(26)[8.4-17.9] | 19.3%(40)[14.2-25.4] | 21.7%(45)[16.3-28.0] | 34.3%(71)[27.9-41.2] | 0.2033 |